|
Post by HayanTokki on Dec 14, 2017 14:36:30 GMT -5
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 14, 2017 15:24:46 GMT -5
i'm talking about chunk errors not chunk holes, but it would be cool making a mineshaft in a chunk hole though.
|
|
|
Post by HayanTokki on Dec 14, 2017 15:29:22 GMT -5
That's not a hole. When they changed the algorithm for world generation from 1.7 to 1.8, you'd literally have extreme hills generate next to plains and other dramatic biome differences without biome smoothing. Which is where this irregular chunk generation topic even started. There will be no errors. The reddit post I linked to isn't actually an error either. Just irregular chunks. Which, I'll repeat, we won't keep irregular chunks and we will manually smooth them down as needed.
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 14, 2017 16:02:59 GMT -5
Ok, but the reddit link said hole, I also ment the biome differences.
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 15, 2017 19:21:29 GMT -5
Did seniors lock the poll or did it expire?
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 15, 2017 19:22:25 GMT -5
Did seniors lock the poll or did it expire?
|
|
|
Post by viktorjunebug on Dec 16, 2017 16:03:35 GMT -5
probably Hayan locked it but idk really
|
|
|
Post by veeesix on Dec 16, 2017 16:30:59 GMT -5
Probably just expired.
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 16, 2017 17:49:25 GMT -5
I don't remember putting an expire date on it.
|
|
|
Post by Cobbett on Dec 16, 2017 19:24:38 GMT -5
It might have had a default expiry date, it was set to lock on the 14th. I've re-opened it.
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 16, 2017 19:33:19 GMT -5
Thx Cobbett
|
|
|
Post by viktorjunebug on Dec 17, 2017 12:20:56 GMT -5
So you think getting players to vote has an impact, it does sort of, but: Hayan said NO. Who owns the server? Hayan. Who gets to have the final say? Hayan. The poll may influence her, but if all the "players" and none of the "staff" (I use the word staff because it groups all the juniors seniors and Hayan together) want it to happen, IT WON'T HAPPEN. The end.
|
|
rubest
Hermit-in-Training
Coke is better than Pepsi.
Posts: 59
Title: Businessman
|
Post by rubest on Dec 19, 2017 5:41:41 GMT -5
If players comes with good arguments hayan could change her mind.
|
|
|
Post by LayaElisabeth on Dec 19, 2017 6:52:26 GMT -5
also not entirely correct.. neither the players, nor the seniorgroup always have the last word. Even if both are opposed to something, we still have to think of the overal good of the server itself.
Example: punching signshops create lag. Now, if tomorrow we find another plugin with wayy less lag, even if said plugin would reset all player balances, and the plugin requires seniors to set it up. it might still be considered.
the example comes from an npc shop system i saw on another server once.. it requires op-perms to set up, and you can choose anyplayer to represent the shop. It was a nifty system, but npc's count as entities too, so don't even think about this XD
On the other hand, i believe decent suggestions for better econ plugins might be considered.. (Might being the keyword, i'm not totally sure)
|
|
|
Post by Cobbett on Dec 19, 2017 17:09:37 GMT -5
Sometimes changes have to be made even if we don't want to change things. It's possible the stables horse plugin won't be updated for 1.13 and we'll have to stop using it.
|
|